Singing on Stream: It's Also a DMCA Violation
Many streamers and bloggers sincerely believe that if they don't play other people's recordings but sing a song themselves – with a guitar or a backing track – then copyright is not violated. After all, their voice is their own, the arrangement is their own, and the lyrics are not someone else's. This is a dangerous misconception. Singing songs on air is just as much a DMCA violation as using original tracks. Moreover, covers can lead to strikes, VOD blocking, and even channel deletion.
In this article, we will analyze why live performance does not exempt from liability, what rights are violated, how platforms (Twitch, YouTube) identify covers, and what to do if you want to sing legally on streams.
Live performance of a song is a public performance of a work
The main legal fact to understand is that a song is not only a sound recording but also a musical work (notes, melody, harmony) and lyrics as a literary work. Copyrights to these objects belong to the composer, poet, and their rights holders, regardless of who performs the song and how.
When you sing someone else's song on a stream, you are publicly performing a protected work. This requires permission from the authors or their representatives. This rule applies worldwide – both in the USA (DMCA) and in Russia (Civil Code of the Russian Federation, Part 4).
There is a difference between using an original recording and a live performance, but it does not make a cover safe. In the case of an original recording, two types of rights are violated: rights to the musical work and rights to the sound recording (phonogram). In the case of a live performance, rights to the musical work and lyrics are violated, but not to the phonogram. This is slightly fewer violations, but the key violation – public performance – remains.
The Memorandum of the Russian Authors' Society (RAO) dated April 24, 2025, directly equates internet streaming with broadcasting and states that online broadcasts require license fees to be paid to authors. RAO intends to go to court to protect the rights of musicians in case of violations. RAO Author's Council President Igor Butman noted that many market participants took advantage of the lack of direct legal provisions, but now this loophole is closing.
Why a cover is not exempt from copyright: compulsory license
There is an important nuance in copyright law that misleads many. In the US and some other countries, for releasing cover versions (recorded studio covers), there is a so-called "compulsory license." It allows you to release a cover on a physical medium or in digital distribution if you comply with certain conditions and pay royalties to the rights holder at a set rate.
However, this compulsory license does not apply to live performances and streams. It only works for recorded and distributed copies. A stream is not the distribution of copies, but a public performance. Therefore, the scheme "I'll just sing and not violate anything" does not work.
Moreover, even if you record a studio cover and release it through a distributor (e.g., TuneCore), you are obliged to independently ensure that all necessary licenses are obtained. In the court case Michelle Shocked v. TuneCore, the court explicitly stated: the distribution of a cover version via streaming falls under the compulsory license, but this does not exempt the performer from the need to comply with the established payment procedure.
There is no compulsory license for live streams. You either need to obtain permission directly from the rights holder (which is practically impossible for popular songs) or use special services that have such permissions.
How platforms find covers: audio recognition technologies
Many streamers think: "I sing myself, so the system won't recognize the song." This is a mistake. Modern audio recognition systems (Audible Magic on Twitch, Content ID on YouTube) analyze not only the finished sound recording but also the melodic, rhythmic, and harmonic characteristics of the work.
Twitch uses the Audible Magic system, which scans VOD recordings in near real-time. If a track played during your live stream matches a database of protected works, the VOD will be muted precisely in the segment where the music was played. You will not get a window for appeal – the audio will simply disappear.
The situation with clips is even worse. If a moment of your stream with a cover is cut into a clip, that clip will be muted or deleted regardless of the status of the original VOD. Even if the stream itself was never blocked.
YouTube uses the Content ID system. Rights holders upload reference copies of their works to the database – including reference recordings of melodies and harmonies. The system automatically compares the audio track of each uploaded video and each stream with this database. A match can occur even for a few seconds of music. A live-sung cover is easily identified by its melody.
Automatic systems do not distinguish between "original track" and "live cover." They recognize the work as such.
Important: VOD is more dangerous than live broadcast
The distinction between a live stream and a saved VOD is key to understanding the risks. Twitch has licensing agreements with some collective management organizations (ASCAP, BMI). These agreements may partially cover the public performance of music in a live broadcast. This is why for many years streamers sang songs live with impunity, and problems only arose with VODs.
However, VOD is not a public performance. It is the reproduction and distribution of a recording. VODs require mechanical and synchronization licenses, which Twitch's licensing agreements typically do not cover.
Our Services for Streamers
Our Services for Content Creators
